

Google’s goal has always been to improve the user experience. That’s why it has developed tools like Pagespeed Insights, Lighthouse, AMP, and the Chrome UX Report. From that effort comes the Core Web Vitals initiative, which unifies key metrics to measure a website’s performance and usability.
Core Web Vitals provide clear indicators to detect and improve usability and performance issues. At La Teva Web, we work with both technical teams and marketing/business professionals to help improve them.
Measures how long it takes to load the largest visible content element on the page (image, video, text block...)
Good: < 2.5 s | Needs Improvement: 2.5–4 s | Poor: > 4 s
Measures visual stability. This reflects whether elements shift unexpectedly during load, which can lead to frustration or accidental clicks.
Good: < 0.1 | Needs Improvement: 0.1–0.25 | Poor: > 0.25
Since March 2024, INP has replaced FID as the official interactivity metric. It measures the longest response time of a user interaction (click, keypress, etc.) on the page.
Good: < 200 ms | Needs Improvement: 200–500 ms | Poor: > 500 ms
Want to know more? Read our dedicated article about INP (Interaction to Next Paint).
Select representative URLs from your site (homepage, categories, product pages…). Then use tools like Lighthouse or PageSpeed Insights to assess performance. Also compare with competitors to prioritize efforts.
Yes. Since 2024, Core Web Vitals are part of Google’s real-world page experience signals and directly influence SEO rankings. A technically optimized site performs better in search, reduces bounce rates, and boosts conversions.
Want to improve your Core Web Vitals? At La Teva Web, we specialize in technical SEO and performance optimization. Get in touch and let us help you create a faster, more usable, and better-ranking website.

Hello! drop us a line
Optimize the quality of user experience